Joseph and Marlene Schnell - Page 4

                                        - 4 -                                         
          A tax refund of $3,653, the amount of Federal income tax withheld           
          from Schnell’s wages for the year, was requested by petitioners.            
               For each of the years in issue, the Schedule C for Barad               
          reflected zero gross receipts and zero cost of goods sold.                  
          Therefore, petitioners did not report any gross income for Barad.           
          It was the practice of petitioners, over many years (including              
          the years in issue), to calculate and claim the amount of bad               
          debt necessary in order to arrive at zero taxable income and to             
          request a refund in the amount equal to Schnell’s Federal income            
          tax withholdings for that year.  Petitioner did not consult any             
          tax professional regarding his tax returns.                                 
                                       OPINION                                        
          Bad Debt Deduction and Advertising and Office Expense Deductions            
               Section 166(a) allows a deduction for “any debt which                  
          becomes worthless within the taxable year.”  However, worthless             
          debts arising from unpaid wages, fees, and similar items of                 
          taxable income are not deductible as a bad debt unless the                  
          taxpayer has included the amount in income for the year for which           
          the bad debt is deducted or for a prior tax year.  See Gertz v.             
          Commissioner, 64 T.C. 598, 600 (1975); sec. 1.166-1(e), Income              
          Tax Regs.; see also Prowse v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-120;            
          Crosson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-170.  “‘It is well                 
          settled that a taxpayer is not allowed to reduce ordinary income            
          actually received by the amount of income he failed to receive.’”           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011