Joseph and Marlene Schnell - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          determine whether a rule or regulation exists, under                        
          circumstances which demonstrate a substantial deviation from the            
          standard of conduct that a reasonable person would observe.”                
          Sec. 1.6662-3(b)(2), Income Tax Regs.                                       
               The section 6662(a) penalty is not imposed with respect to             
          any portion of the underpayment as to which the taxpayer acted              
          with reasonable cause and in good faith.  Sec. 6664(c)(1); see              
          also Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 448 (2001).  The                 
          decision as to whether a taxpayer acted with reasonable cause and           
          in good faith is made by taking into account all of the pertinent           
          facts and circumstances.  Sec. 1.6664-4(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.             
          Relevant factors include the taxpayer’s efforts to assess his or            
          her proper tax liability, including an honest misunderstanding of           
          fact or law that is reasonable in light of all of the facts and             
          circumstances.  Id.                                                         
               Petitioner has made no argument that penalties should not be           
          sustained.  Petitioner argues:                                              
                    The Petitioner, over the years, would try many                    
               different ways to resolve his losses.  This was a major                
               mistake and a costly one on the Petitioner’s part in                   
               learning that going against a municipal agency with                    
               unlimited funds is an impossible task, especially when                 
               you have no income.  This is why the Petitioner started                
               writing off his losses as a bad debt knowing the IRS                   
               [Internal Revenue Service] would pick it up and                        
               challenge his claims and provide the Petitioner with an                
               avenue for a ruling by a U.S. court, granting the                      
               Petitioner the right to declare the City of New York a                 
               “bona fide debt”.                                                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011