John M. and Thelma Smoll - Page 3

                                         -3-                                          
          respondent’s determinations of the additions to tax and                     
          penalties.3  We sustain those determinations in full.                       
          I.  Background                                                              
               Petitioners were previously before the Court for taxable               
          years 1997 and 1998 in the cases of God’s Helping Hands Living              
          Estate Plan Trust, John M. & Thelma Smoll, Trustees v.                      
          Commissioner, docket No. 8468-01, and John M. & Thelma Smoll,               
          Trustees v. Commissioner, docket No. 8489-01.  Those cases were             
          resolved with a Closing Agreement on Final Determination Covering           
          Specific Matters (closing agreement).  That litigation involved a           
          dispute between the parties as to whether God’s Helping Hands               
          Living Estate Plan Trust should be recognized for Federal income            
          tax purposes.  God’s Helping Hands Living Estate Plan Trust had             
          been established by petitioners and purported to operate a                  
          farming business, holding title to the Smoll family residence,              
          vehicles, and other personal assets, along with deducting the               
          personal living expenses of the taxpayers.  The closing agreement           
          provided the following:                                                     
                    NOW IT IS HEREBY DETERMINED AND AGREED FOR FEDERAL                
               INCOME TAX PURPOSES THAT:                                              
               1.   The God’s Helping Hands Living Estate Plan shall                  
               be disregarded for federal income tax purposes;                        
               2.   The taxpayers agree that there was no substantial                 
               change in the manner in which they transacted their                    

               3 At trial, the Court informed the parties that it would               
          grant respondent’s motion with respect to the deficiencies in               
          Federal income tax.                                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011