John M. and Thelma Smoll - Page 6

                                         -6-                                          
          failure to file nor produced evidence to establish any reasonable           
          cause for their failure to file the returns.  We sustain                    
          respondent’s determination of the addition to tax under section             
          6651(a)(1).                                                                 
               2.  Additions to Tax Under Section 6654                                
               Respondent determined that petitioner underpaid his                    
          estimated income tax and is liable for an addition to tax under             
          section 6654 for 1999, 2002, and 2003.  Where payments of tax,              
          either through withholding or by making estimated tax payments,             
          do not equal the percentage of the total liability required under           
          the statute, imposition of an addition to tax under section 6654            
          is automatic, absent a showing that the taxpayer has met one of             
          the exceptions contained therein.  See Recklitis v. Commissioner,           
          91 T.C. 874, 913 (1988).  Because petitioner has not shown that             
          any of the exceptions apply, we sustain respondent’s                        
          determination on this issue.                                                
               3.  Additions to Tax and Penalty Under Sections 6651(f) and            
               6663                                                                   
               Section 6651(f) imposes an addition to tax of up to 75                 
          percent of the amount required to be shown on the tax return when           
          the failure to file a Federal income tax return is due to fraud.            
          Section 6663 imposes a 75-percent penalty on the portion of any             
          underpayment due to fraud.  Because these sections are construed            
          similarly as to a determination of a fraudulent intent, we                  
          consolidate our discussion of respondent’s fraud determinations.            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011