John M. and Thelma Smoll - Page 4

                                         -4-                                          
               business and personal matters before and after the                     
               formation of the trust.                                                
               3.   The taxpayers agree that the trusts are alter egos                
               of themselves and that all assets held in the name of                  
               the trust are the assets of the taxpayers.                             
               4.   The taxpayers agree that all income, expenses,                    
               deductions and credits, as allowed under the                           
               Internal Revenue Code, will be reported on the                         
               individual returns of the taxpayers for taxable years                  
               1997 and 1998 and for all subsequent years. [Emphasis                  
               added.]                                                                
               5.   The taxpayers will be liable for any additional                   
               taxes, civil penalties, and interests on those                         
               individual returns, which may arise because of the non-                
               recognition of the trust arrangement.                                  
               Despite entering into the agreement, petitioners continued             
          to use the trust in 2000 and 2001 and failed to report the                  
          income, expenses, deductions, and credits on their individual               
          returns for those years, which returns they filed after the time            
          permitted by law.  Petitioner did not file a Federal income tax             
          return for 1999, 2002, and 2003.  Petitioners underpaid their               
          income tax for 2000 and 2001.  Petitioner underpaid his income              
          tax for 1999, 2002, and 2003.                                               
               Petitioners were uncooperative during the audit process, and           
          respondent had to engage in summons enforcement.  On April 27,              
          2006, the Court, pursuant to Rule 91(f), granted respondent’s               
          motion to show cause why proposed facts should not be accepted as           
          established and made that order absolute after petitioners failed           
          to file a response as ordered.                                              









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011