- 2 - entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be cited as authority. Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners’ Federal income taxes of $9212 for 2000 and $1,082 for 2001. The issues for decision are: 1. Whether petitioners, husband and wife, had an employer- employee relationship. We find that they did. 2. Whether petitioners may exclude from gross income medical benefits of $3,279 in 2000 and $4,539 in 2001 paid by an employer-spouse to an employee-spouse. We find that they may. 3. Whether petitioners may deduct from gross income medical benefits of $3,279 in 2000 and $4,539 in 2001 paid by an employer-spouse to an employee-spouse. We find that they may. Background Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the accompanying exhibits are incorporated by this reference. Petitioners resided in Rollingstone, Minnesota, at the time they filed the petition. Maureen Speltz Petitioner Maureen Speltz (Mrs. Speltz) has operated a sole proprietorship daycare business in petitioners’ home since 1982. Mrs. Speltz has an elementary education degree, and she has been 2All monetary amounts have been rounded to the nearest dollar.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011