Shirley H. Startzman, Petitioner, and Larry G. Easler, Intervenor - Page 7

                                        - 6 -                                         
          remain unpaid as of July 22, 1998.  The tax liability in the                
          instant case arose during 1997 but remained unpaid as of July 22,           
          1998.  Accordingly, section 6015 applies to the instant case.               
          Washington v. Commissioner, 120 T.C. 137, 145 (2003).                       
               Section 6015(b)(1) requires the Commissioner to grant relief           
          from joint liability if the taxpayer satisfies the following                
          requirements:  (a) The requesting spouse filed a joint return;              
          (b) on the joint return there is an understatement of tax                   
          attributable to the erroneous items of one individual filing the            
          joint return; (c) the requesting spouse establishes that, in                
          signing the joint return, he or she did not know and had no                 
          reason to know that there was such understatement; (d)                      
          considering all the facts and circumstances, it is inequitable to           
          hold the requesting spouse liable for the deficiency in tax                 
          attributable to such understatement; and (e) the requesting                 
          spouse files her request for relief no later than 2 years from              
          the date the Secretary began collection activities against the              
          requesting spouse.  A requesting spouse must satisfy all of these           
          requirements to qualify for section 6015 relief.  Alt v.                    
          Commissioner, 119 T.C. 306, 313 (2002), affd. 101 Fed. Appx. 34             
          (6th Cir. 2004).  Except as otherwise provided in section 6015,             
          the requesting spouse bears the burden of proving she satisfies             
          each requirement of section 6015(b)(1).  See Rule 142(a); Alt v.            
          Commissioner, supra at 311.                                                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011