Shirley H. Startzman, Petitioner, and Larry G. Easler, Intervenor - Page 10

                                        - 9 -                                         
               Rev. Proc. 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B. 447,3 provides factors that            
          weigh in favor of, and against, granting relief.  Factors that              
          favor granting relief include:  (1) Marital status; (2) economic            
          hardship; (3) abuse; (4) no knowledge or reason to know of the              
          item giving rise to the deficiency; (5) whether the nonrequesting           
          spouse had a legal obligation to pay the deficiency; and (6)                
          whether the item giving rise to the deficiency is attributable              
          to the nonrequesting spouse.  Id. sec. 4.03, 2000-1 C.B. at                 
          448-449.  Factors that weigh against granting relief include:               
          (1) The item giving rise to the deficiency is attributable to the           
          requesting spouse; (2) the requesting spouse knew or had reason             
          to know of the item giving rise to the deficiency (an extremely             
          strong factor); (3) the requesting spouse has benefited, beyond             
          normal support, from the item giving rise to the deficiency; (4)            
          the requesting spouse will not experience economic hardship if              
          relief is not granted; (5) the requesting spouse has not made a             
          good faith attempt to comply with the tax laws in subsequent                
          years; and (6) the requesting spouse has a legal obligation to              
          pay the liability.  Id. at 449.                                             




               3Rev. Proc. 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B. 447, applies to the instant           
          case because the preliminary determination letter was issued on             
          Oct. 21, 2003.  Rev. Proc. 2003-61, 2003-2 C.B. 296, which                  
          superseded Rev. Proc. 2000-15, supra, is effective for pending              
          requests for sec. 6015 relief for which no preliminary                      
          determination letter was issued as of Nov. 1, 2003.                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011