William A. Stewart - Page 11

                                       - 11 -                                         

          or on or before a prescribed date, section 7502 does not apply to           
          motions for leave.”  Id.  The Court of Appeals for the Ninth                
          Circuit reversed, holding that “The combined effect of � 7481(a)            
          and � 7483 of the Internal Revenue Code and of Federal Rule of              
          Appellate Procedure 13(a) is to create a ninety-day period to               
          file a notice of appeal or a motion for leave.  This ninety-day             
          period is a ‘prescribed period’ within the meaning of �                     
          7502(a)(1).”  Manchester Group v. Commissioner, 113 F.3d at                 
          1089.6                                                                      
               The instant case provides an occasion to reconsider our                
          Memorandum Opinion in Manchester Group.  In Lawrence v.                     
          Commissioner, 27 T.C. 713, 716 (1957), revd. 258 F.2d 562 (9th              
          Cir. 1958), we stated:                                                      
                    One of the difficult problems which confronted the                
               Tax Court, soon after it was created in 1926 as the                    
               Board of Tax Appeals, was what to do when an issue came                
               before it again after a Court of Appeals had reversed                  
               its prior decision on that point.  Clearly, it must                    
               thoroughly reconsider the problem in the light of the                  
               reasoning of the reversing appellate court and, if                     




               6 The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit further                   
          reasoned that the mere existence of limited exceptions in which             
          the Tax Court can grant a motion for leave after the decision               
          becomes final, e.g., lack of jurisdiction to have entered the               
          decision in the first place or fraud on the court, does not mean            
          there is not a prescribed period.  Manchester Group v.                      
          Commissioner, 113 F.3d 1087, 1089 n.2 (9th Cir. 1997), revg. T.C.           
          Memo. 1994-604.                                                             





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011