William A. Stewart - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         

               The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Manchester               
          Group v. Commissioner, 113 F.3d at 1089, concluded that the                 
          combined effect of sections 7481(a) and 7483, together with rule            
          13(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, was to create            
          a 90-day prescribed period to file a notice of appeal or a motion           
          for leave.  Upon reflection, we agree.  A decision of the Tax               
          Court becomes final “Upon the expiration of the time allowed for            
          filing a notice of appeal, if no such notice has been duly filed            
          within such time”.  Sec. 7481(a)(1).  Section 7483 provides that            
          a notice of appeal may be filed within 90 days after a decision             
          is entered.  Pursuant to rule 13(a) of the Federal Rules of                 
          Appellate Procedure, which governs review of Tax Court decisions,           
          if a timely motion to vacate is made, the time for appeal “runs             
          from the entry of the order disposing of the motion or from the             
          entry of a new decision, whichever is later.”  Together these               
          provisions can reasonably be read to create a 90-day period                 
          prescribed under the authority of the internal revenue laws in              
          which a taxpayer could file a motion for leave to file a motion             
          to vacate a decision.  We conclude that the reasoning of the                
          Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Manchester Group with             
          regard to the application of section 7502 to motions for leave is           
          persuasive and should be followed.  Accordingly, we will no                 
          longer follow our prior Memorandum Opinion in Manchester Group v.           
          Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1994-604.                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011