- 7 -
and completion of any other matters required to prepare for
trial; (C) that the parties advise the Court whether they
believed that a trial of this case will be necessary, that the
case may be disposed of by a motion for summary judgment, or that
the case may be submitted fully stipulated pursuant to Rule 122;
(D) that respondent’s and petitioner’s status reports shall be
limited to discussing their proposed schedules for the
preparation for trial of this case and advising the Court whether
they believe that a trial of this case will be necessary, that
the case may be disposed of by a motion for summary judgment, or
that the case may be submitted fully stipulated pursuant to Rule
122 in order for this Court to implement the mandate of the Court
of Appeals; and (E) that the status report shall not include any
arguments addressing the merits of four issues remanded to this
Court for further proceedings. Respondent’s status report was
due on or before April 18, 2005. Petitioner’s status report was
due on or before May 9, 2005.
On April 19, 2005, respondent filed his status report with
the Court. On May 13, 2005, petitioner filed his status report
with the Court. Petitioner and respondent agreed that further
trial was not necessary and that this case could be disposed of
by a motion for summary judgment. The parties advised the Court
that they each would file a motion for summary judgment by June
3, 2005.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011