- 11 -
On January 26, 2006, petitioner filed a motion to sanction
respondent’s counsel, a motion to strike, and a motion to require
respondent to file motion to withdraw or substitution of counsel.
On January 26, 27, and 30, 2006, the Court conducted further
trial of the case.
On January 30, 2006, petitioner filed a motion for mistrial
or, in the alternative, to enforce Court Rules on withdrawal and
substitution of counsel, and other remedies. The Court took this
motion and the three motions petitioner filed on January 26,
2006, under advisement.
On May 1, 2006, respondent filed his opening brief, and on
May 3, 2006, petitioner filed his opening brief. On June 15,
2006, respondent filed his reply brief, and on June 19, 2006,
petitioner filed his reply brief.
On August 9, 2006, on account of our ongoing review of this
case, we ordered respondent to file, on August 28, 2006, a status
report stating (and containing documentation to support) whether
petitioner’s 1989 liability had been fully paid as of that date
and, if not, the amount of petitioner’s outstanding balance for
1989 as of that date. Furthermore, we ordered petitioner to
file, on or before September 8, 2006, a reply to respondent’s
status report stating whether petitioner agreed with respondent’s
status report or, if petitioner disagreed with respondent’s
status report, stating (and containing documentation to support)
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011