Raymond Wright - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
          full.  When he received a payoff figure from respondent, he paid            
          that amount.  In his August 28, 2006, status report, respondent             
          admitted that on March 27, 2003, petitioner was quoted an                   
          incorrect payoff figure and this was a ministerial error pursuant           
          to the regulations.  See also Krugman v. Commissioner, 112 T.C.             
          230 (1999); Douponce v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-398.                  
          Accordingly, we conclude that for 1989 interest from March 27,              
          2003, to the present shall be abated.  We note, however, that we            
          lack jurisdiction to determine whether an overpayment exists or             
          to order a refund or credit for 1989 to the extent that the                 
          amount of the abatement of interest exceeds the amount remaining            
          unpaid for 1989.  See Greene-Thapedi v. Commissioner, 126 T.C. 1            
          (2006).                                                                     
               With regard to the fourth question posed by the Court of               
          Appeals--in any case, whether the current interest abatement that           
          petitioner had already received was correct in light of (1) the             
          IRS’s failure to give petitioner the appropriate withholding                
          credits for 1987 and 1989, and (2) his June 21, 1994, payment of            
          $6,681.22--on the basis of petitioner’s credible evidence,                  
          respondent’s admissions, and the lack of credibility of the                 
          documentary and testimonial evidence offered by respondent, which           
          was contradictory and contained numerous errors, that respondent            
          has failed to establish that the current interest abatement is              
          correct.                                                                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011