Edward W. and Edith M. Arnold - Page 13




                                        -13-                                          
         Accordingly, we conclude that petitioners are not entitled to a              
         deduction for a loss related to Orion during the years in issue.5            
         III.  Addition to Tax and Penalties                                          
              Section 7491(c) provides that the Commissioner will bear the            
         burden of production with respect to the liability of any                    
         individual for additions to tax.  “The Commissioner’s burden of              
         production under section 7491(c) is to produce evidence that it              
         is appropriate to impose the relevant penalty, addition to tax,              
         or additional amount”.  Swain v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 358, 363             
         (2002); see also Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 446                   
         (2001).  The Commissioner, however, does not have the obligation             
         to introduce evidence regarding reasonable cause or substantial              
         authority.  Higbee v. Commissioner, supra at 446-447.                        
              A.  Section 6651(a)(1) Addition to Tax                                  
              Section 6651(a)(1) imposes an addition to tax for failure to            
         file a return on the date prescribed (determined with regard to              
         any extension of time for filing), unless the taxpayer can                   
         establish that such failure is due to reasonable cause and not               
         due to willful neglect.  A Federal income tax return made on the             


               5  We note that the issue regarding the alleged $20,000                
          capital loss related to Orion first arose at trial.  In their               
          opening brief, petitioners state that the issue regarding Orion             
          “[opened] the possibility of reporting the loss as a                        
          Casualty/Theft loss.  With full disclosure, Petitioner [sic] has            
          elected the capital loss as all they knew in 2002, [sic] was that           
          the investment was worthless.”  Accordingly, whether there was a            
          theft loss is not at issue.                                                 






Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007