Wayne B. Bailey - Page 8




                                        - 7 -                                         
          because petitioner failed to substantiate the Schedule C                    
          deductions.                                                                 
               In general, the Commissioner’s determinations set forth in a           
          notice of deficiency are presumed correct, and the taxpayer bears           
          the burden of showing that the determinations are erroneous.4               
          Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115 (1933).                  
          However, when the Commissioner relies on a basis or theory at               
          trial which was not stated or described in the notice of                    
          deficiency, and the new basis or theory requires the presentation           
          of different evidence, the Commissioner has raised “new matter”,            
          and the burden of proof falls on him with respect to that new               
          matter.  Rule 142(a); Shea v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 183, 197               
          (1999); Wayne Bolt & Nut Co. v. Commissioner, 93 T.C. 500, 507              
          (1989).  In determining whether the Commissioner has given a                
          taxpayer sufficient notice of his basis for determining a                   
          deficiency, we examine a notice of deficiency in conjunction with           
          documents provided to a taxpayer or his or her representative               
          during the examination of a taxpayer’s income tax return.  Bitker           
          v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-209.                                       
               A.  Section 195                                                        
               Amounts paid or incurred in connection with creating an                


               4  Petitioner has neither claimed nor shown that he                    
          satisfied the requirements of sec. 7491(a) to shift the burden of           
          proof to respondent with regard to any factual issue.                       
          Accordingly, petitioner bears the burden of proof.  Rule 142(a).            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007