Douglas W. and Gail Caple - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
          in 1994, Mr. Caple worked part time both as a school bus driver             
          and as a manager at Best Buy, an electronics retailer.  Most                
          recently, Mr. Caple has worked as a day trader of stocks.2                  
          Petitioner Gail Caple (Mrs. Caple) is employed by Affinity Health           
          Systems as an insurance specialist.                                         
               Before Mr. Caple’s separation from Ocean Angle Steel, he               
          underwent job-related medical testing that uncovered a condition            
          known as primary sclerosing cholangitis, a terminal disease, the            
          only known cure for which is a liver transplant.  At or near the            
          time of Mr. Caple’s diagnosis, his father (who was also suffering           
          from an unspecified terminal illness) gave petitioners the funds            
          necessary for Mr. Caple to pay for a liver transplant, provided             
          he were to receive a donor organ.  Although petitioners attempted           
          to “shelter”3 this gift, they later used the funds for                      
          unspecified expenses.                                                       
               Petitioners have one child, Ashley Caple (Ashley), who is a            
          student at the University of Wisconsin at Oshkosh.  In addition             
          to paying Ashley’s college expenses totaling $14,000 per year               
          (tuition, room, and board), petitioners maintain health insurance           
          coverage for Ashley.  Petitioners incurred all medical costs for            



               2 In 2003, petitioners reported sales in excess of $2                  
          million from Mr. Caple’s day trading activity.                              
               3 This description is petitioners’, not the Court’s.                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008