Douglas W. and Gail Caple - Page 13




                                       - 12 -                                         
          Abatement of Interest and Adjustment of Penalties                           
               Petitioners challenge respondent’s collection action on the            
          grounds that respondent did not properly account for an agreement           
          reached between petitioners and respondent’s Milwaukee Problem              
          Resolution Office to abate all interest and adjust the section              
          6662(e) penalty to zero for each of the taxable years at issue.             
          Ms. Roberts testified that the agreement reached between the                
          parties applied to the original assessment only and did not apply           
          to the period after the assessment where petitioners’ outstanding           
          liability went unpaid.                                                      
               Our review of the record12 indicates that respondent did, in           
          fact, abate interest and adjust the section 6662(e) penalty to              
          zero with respect to the original assessment for each of the                
          taxable years in issue.  We believe Ms. Roberts’s testimony that            
          the agreement between the parties applied to the original                   
          assessment only and not to the period after the assessment                  
          through the present.  Accordingly, we hold that respondent did              
          properly abate and adjust the interest and the section 6662                 
          penalties with respect to the assessments made for petitioners’             
          1993 and 1994 taxable years.                                                



               12 Specifically, respondent’s account statements for                   
          petitioners’ 1993 and 1994 taxable years.  These documents were             
          provided to petitioners, and petitioners offered no evidence to             
          contradict their content.                                                   






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008