Douglas W. and Gail Caple - Page 7




                                        - 6 -                                         
          Collections Action and Petitioners’ Offer-in-Compromise                     
               On June 24, 2002, respondent filed a Notice of Federal Tax             
          Lien and Your Right to a Hearing Under IRC 6320 showing $1,346.96           
          owed for taxable year 1993 and $15,346.52 owed for taxable year             
          1994.  Respondent sent to petitioners a Final Notice--Intent to             
          Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing on June 27, 2002.                
               On August 19, 2002, petitioners mailed to respondent a Form            
          12153, Request for a Collection Due Process Hearing (CDP                    
          hearing).  Respondent notified petitioners by letter on September           
          19, 2002, that he had received petitioners’ request for a CDP               
          hearing and, in turn, had forwarded that request to his Appeals             
          Office.                                                                     
               On May 13, 2004,6 Appeals Officer Beverly A. Roberts (Ms.              
          Roberts) responded in writing to petitioners’ request for a CDP             
          hearing.  Ms. Roberts informed petitioners that they could                  
          request either a face-to-face meeting or a telephone conference.            
          Petitioners requested a telephone conference with Ms. Roberts for           
          their CDP hearing on May 27, 2004.                                          






               6 At trial, respondent acknowledged that for reasons                   
          unbeknownst to him, no action had occurred on petitioners’ file             
          from September 2002 until May 2004.  Our examination of the                 
          record, however, indicates that respondent was notified on July             
          24, 2002, that petitioners were parties in a bankruptcy suit.               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008