Scott W. Cosby - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
               As relevant here, on his timely filed 2002 Federal income              
          tax return petitioner claimed an alimony deduction for the family           
          support payments.  Respondent disallowed that deduction in the              
          notice of deficiency.  An explanation for the disallowance is not           
          provided in the copy of the notice of deficiency placed in the              
          record.                                                                     
               Petitioner’s former spouse did not include the family                  
          support payments in her 2002 income.                                        
          Discussion                                                                  
               It is well settled that deductions are a matter of                     
          legislative grace and that the taxpayer must establish                      
          entitlement to any deduction claimed.  Rule 142(a); INDOPCO, Inc.           
          v. Commissioner, 503 U.S. 79, 84 (1992); New Colonial Ice Co. v.            
          Helvering, 292 U.S. 435, 440 (1934).                                        
               In the case of an individual, section 215(a) “[allows] as a            
          deduction an amount equal to the alimony * * * payments paid                
          during such individual’s taxable year.”  The definition of                  
          “alimony”, for purposes of section 215(a), is found in section              
          71.  Sec. 215(b).                                                           
               In general and as relevant here, section 71(b)(1) defines              
          the term “alimony” as any cash payment if:  (1) The payment is              








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011