-15- entitled to the exclusion for either property because the Hagerstown house was petitioners’ principal residence at all times. Whether a residence qualifies as the taxpayer’s principal residence for purposes of section 121 is a question of fact that is resolved with reference to all the facts and circumstances. Sec. 1.121-1(b)(2), Income Tax Regs.; see also Thomas v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 206, 244 (1989); Clapham v. Commissioner, 63 T.C. 505, 508 (1975). “If a taxpayer alternates between 2 properties, using each as a residence for successive periods of time, the property that the taxpayer uses a majority of the time during the year ordinarily will be considered the taxpayer’s principal residence.” Sec. 1.121-1(b)(2), Income Tax Regs.6 In order to meet the 2-year use requirement, occupancy of the residence is required.7 Sec. 1.121-1(c)(2)(i), Income Tax Regs. 6Sec. 1.121-1, Income Tax Regs., generally applies to sales and exchanges that occurred on or after Dec. 24, 2002. However, for sales or exchanges of a principal residence before Dec. 24, 2002, but after May 7, 1997, taxpayers may elect to apply sec. 1.121-1, Income Tax Regs., by filing a return for the taxable year of the sale or exchange that does not include the gain from the sale. Sec. 1.121-4(j), Income Tax Regs. The sale of the Berlin residence took place on Oct. 27, 2001. Petitioners’ 2001 return did not include the gain from the sale of the Berlin residence. Therefore, sec. 1.121-1, Income Tax Regs., applies to the sale. Nevertheless, our decision in this case would be the same whether or not sec. 1.121-1, Income Tax Regs., applied. 7Short temporary absences, such as for vacation, are counted as periods of use. Sec. 1.121-1(c)(2)(i), Income Tax Regs.Page: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008