Estate of Frances Elaine Freedman, Deceased, Robin Elaine Carnette, Personal Representative - Page 17

                                       - 17 -                                         
          have very different views as to the result that should obtain               
          from applying TPC 438(a) here.                                              
               It is respondent’s position that the record in this case               
          establishes both that decedent contributed all the property                 
          placed in the Valdes & Moreno account and that she did not intend           
          at the time she opened and funded the account to make a gift of             
          eConnect stock to Mr. Greene.  The estate, in contrast, while not           
          disputing the applicability of TPC 438(a),3 argues that decedent            
          clearly intended to effect a gift of one-half of the eConnect               
          stock to Mr. Greene by placing it in the joint account.  The                
          estate also points to a presumption in Texas common law that a              
          parent intends to make a gift to a child upon delivering                    
          possession, conveying title, or purchasing property in the name             
          of the child.                                                               
               As previously quoted, TPC 438(a) legislates ownership of               
          joint accounts during life in proportion to respective                      
          contributions, absent clear and convincing proof of a contrary              
          intent.  The evidence here is unequivocal in showing that all of            
          the eConnect stock funding the Valdes & Moreno account was                  
          contributed by decedent and that Mr. Greene at no time placed any           
          of his personal assets in the account.  Hence, the focus of this            

               3 Although the estate failed to cite or mention TPC 438(a)             
          on opening brief, the estate’s reply brief and subsequent motion            
          to reopen the record quote and discuss the statute in a manner              
          presumptive of its applicability and never so much as allege that           
          TPC 438(a) is not operative here.                                           





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011