- 4 - Ciraolo) entered an appearance in the Gazis’ Tax Court case. In the motion for leave to file a motion to vacate final decision in the Gazis’ Tax Court case, Mr. Gazi argued that the Gazis’ Tax Court decision resulted from the perpetration of fraud on the Court by Mr. Kauffman and counsel for the Commissioner. Accord- ing to Mr. Gazi, the stipulated decision document in the Gazis’ Tax Court case was executed without the Gazis’ knowledge or authorization. On December 15, 2004, the Court granted the motion to withdraw Mr. Kauffman as counsel in the Gazis’ Tax Court case. On May 23, 2005, a revenue officer with respondent’s collec- tion division (revenue officer) contacted Ms. Ciraolo, the authorized representative of Mr. Gazi and Ms. Gazi’s estate, and advised her that he was recommending that a notice of Federal tax lien be filed with respect to the Gazis’ unpaid liabilities for 1983 through 1989. In response, Ms. Ciraolo requested a hearing under respondent’s Collection Appeals Program (CAP). On June 14, 2005, a settlement officer (CAP hearing settle- ment officer) held a CAP hearing with Ms. Ciraolo. The CAP 4(...continued) case and to amend the caption of that case was filed with the Court. Thereafter, the Court issued an Order granting that motion and, inter alia, changing the caption of the Gazis’ Tax Court case to read “Mohammed A. Gazi and Estate of Raees I. Gazi, Deceased, Mohammed A. Gazi, Personal Representative, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent”. (We shall refer to the estate of Raees Iftekhar Gazi, deceased, Mohammed A. Gazi, personal representative, as Ms. Gazi’s estate.)Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008