Mohammed Ali Gazi and Estate of Raees Iftekhar Gazi, Deceased, Mohammed Ali Gazi, Personal Representative - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
               and a return envelope for your convenience.                            
               Mr. Gazi and Ms. Gazi’s estate did not submit Form 433-A,              
          Collection Information Statement for Wage Earners and Self-                 
          Employed Individuals (Form 433-A), within 14 days of the date of            
          the settlement officer’s March 27, 2006 letter, i.e., by April              
          10, 2006.                                                                   
               On April 18, 2006, Ms. Ciraolo called the settlement officer           
          to reschedule the Appeals Office hearing that the settlement                
          officer offered Mr. Gazi and Ms. Gazi’s estate in the settlement            
          officer’s March 27, 2006 letter.  During that conversation, the             
          settlement officer agreed to reschedule the Appeals Office                  
          hearing from April 25 to May 15, 2006.                                      
               On May 15, 2006, Ms. Ciraolo called the settlement officer.            
          The settlement officer made the following pertinent entries in              
          his “Case Activity Records” with respect to that call:                      
               TC from POA [Ms. Ciraolo].  She said she did not have                  
               the 433A complete and would like to delay conference                   
               for at least another week.  I advised that was not                     
               acceptable since we already delayed the conference                     
               once.  She had no info to present.  I advised her when                 
               she has her 433A completed she can submit it with a                    
               request for an IA thru Compliance.  She then said their                
               issue is the same, the money is not owed.  I advised I                 
               will agree with the previous decision by the court the                 
               money is owed and the RO’s action was correct.  Since                  
               an alternative could not be agreed upon, I will issue a                
               determination letter.  [Reproduced literally.]                         
               On May 17, 2006, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh                 
          Circuit remanded the Gazis’ Tax Court case to the Court for a               
          ruling on the motion for reconsideration of the July 28, 2005               






Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008