- 9 - 1.274-5T(b)(3)(i) through (v), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46015 (Nov. 6, 1985). Petitioner’s evidence consisted of the spreadsheet listing the numbers he put on his return. Petitioner did not testify as to his expenses for travel and meals and entertainment nor submit any receipts to verify his payment of the claimed expenses in 2002. See secs. 446(a), (c), 461(a). The Court finds that petitioner has not satisfied the strict substantiation requirements of section 274(d), and therefore, the expenses are not deductible. Accordingly, respondent’s determinations are sustained. D. Truck Purchase as a Section 179 Expense Section 179(a) generally allows a taxpayer to elect to treat the cost of section 179 property as a current expense in the year the property is placed in service, within certain dollar limitations. If the property is used for both business and other purposes, then the portion of the property’s cost that is attributable to the business use is eligible for expensing under section 179 but only if more than 50 percent of the property’s use is for business purposes (the predominant use requirement). See sec. 1.179-1(d), Income Tax Reg.; see also Whalley v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1996-533. Moreover, in order to claim a deduction for listed property, which is defined in section 280F(d)(4) to include a passenger automobile, the taxpayer mustPage: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008