Howard K. Hager - Page 13




                                       - 12 -                                         
          L. 94-455, sec. 601(a), 90 Stat. 1569, the Senate Finance                   
          Committee report explained the exclusive use requirement as                 
          follows:                                                                    
               Exclusive use of a portion of a taxpayer’s dwelling                    
               unit means that the taxpayer must use a specific part                  
               of a dwelling unit solely for the purpose of carrying                  
               on his trade or business.  The use of a portion of a                   
               dwelling unit for both personal purposes and for the                   
               carrying on of a trade or business does not meet the                   
               exclusive use test.  Thus, for example, a taxpayer who                 
               uses a den in his dwelling unit to write legal briefs,                 
               prepare tax returns, or engage in similar activities as                
               well for personal purposes, will be denied a deduction                 
               for the expenses paid or incurred in connection with                   
               the use of the residence which are allocable to these                  
               activities. * * * [Emphasis added.]                                    
          S. Rept. 94-938, at 148 (1976), 1976-3 C.B. (Vol. 3) 49, 186; see           
          also H. Rept. 94-658, at 161 (1975), 1976-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) 695,              
          853; Staff of Joint Comm. on Taxation, General Explanation of the           
          Tax Reform Act of 1976, at 140 (1976), 1976-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) 1,              
          152.  Similarly, the Court has declined to find that a specific             
          portion of a residence had been used exclusively for business               
          purposes where both business and personal activities permeate an            
          entire residence.  Williams v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1991-567;           
          Naggar v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1983-559.                                
               The exclusive use requirement is an all-or-nothing standard.           
          See Hamacher v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 348, 356 (1990).  When a              
          taxpayer uses a home office in conducting numerous business                 
          activities, each use must be of a type described in section                 
          280A(c)(1); otherwise, the exclusive use requirement is not                 







Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008