Edward Atlee Howes - Page 10




                                        - 9 -                                         
               The Securities and Exchange Commission brought a civil suit            
          against Alpha Telcom in 2001, alleging that the pay telephone               
          scheme was a security and that the company was in violation of              
          Federal securities law; the decision was affirmed by the U.S.               
          Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 2003.  See SEC v.                 
          Rubera, 350 F.3d 1084, 1087 (9th Cir. 2003).                                
               In the notice of deficiency that gave rise to the instant              
          case, respondent disallowed the depreciation deductions                     
          petitioner claimed because petitioner did not have a depreciable            
          interest in the telephones.  Respondent also disallowed the                 
          disabled access credits petitioner claimed because petitioner had           
          not demonstrated that he was in a trade or business, that the               
          expenses were reasonable, or that the expenses were enabling a              
          business to comply with the ADA.                                            
                                     Discussion                                       
          A.  Depreciation Deductions                                                 
               Section 167(a) allows as a depreciation deduction a                    
          reasonable allowance for the “exhaustion, wear and tear” of                 
          property (1) used in a trade or business or (2) held for the                
          production of income.  Sec. 167(a)(1) and (2).                              




               7(...continued)                                                        
          bankruptcy matter so that proceedings could continue in Federal             
          District Court, where there was a pending receivership involving            
          debtors.                                                                    






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007