- 6 - draft even after he received Wells’s July 14 letter--the one making clear that a subpoena would make Wells unavailable. Moving quickly, Talbott on July 21 issued the official notice of determination sustaining the notice of intent to levy, a mere month after he had sent his first letter to Wells. Industrial filed a timely petition in this Court and trial was held in Los Angeles, which is near Industrial’s principal place of business. OPINION The Commissioner may levy on property belonging to a taxpayer once he gives proper notice and an opportunity for a hearing. See secs. 6330, 6331.3 During the hearing, a taxpayer can only challenge the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability if he either (1) did not receive a statutory notice of deficiency, or (2) did not otherwise have an opportunity to dispute the liability. Sec. 6330(c)(2)(B). Industrial has had its day in Tax Court, so it can no longer contest its liability-- it can win only if it shows that the Commissioner abused his discretion. Sego v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 610 (2000); Goza v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 176, 181-182 (2000). He abuses his discretion when he acts “arbitrarily, capriciously, or without sound basis in fact or law.” Woodral v. Commissioner, 112 T.C. 3 Unless otherwise noted, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years at issue; all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007