Industrial Investors - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
          case,” including the accuracy and relative importance of alleged            
          facts in the case, and the “originating function’s perception of            
          the demeanor or credibility of the taxpayer or taxpayer’s                   
          representative.”  Id., Q&A-5, 2000-2 C.B. at 405-06.                        
               There can’t be any suspense in our holding on this point--             
          the cover letter sent to Talbott that accompanied the                       
          administrative file was precisely the sort of prohibited ex parte           
          contact that the Commissioner and Congress wanted to ban.  It put           
          the revenue officer’s spin on what he thought of Wells and                  
          Industrial, and blatantly advocated a particular result.  In two            
          recent cases, Drake v. Commissioner, 125 T.C. 201 (2005), and               
          Moore v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2006-171, we held that                    
          communications very similar to the cover letter in this case were           
          likewise prohibited ex parte communications.  Drake featured a              
          memorandum by an IRS employee telling the Appeals officer that he           
          believed the taxpayer and her attorney had used the Bankruptcy              
          Court to bypass a federal tax lien and get their hands on the               
          proceeds from a sale of their encumbered property.  Drake, 125              
          T.C. at 203.  Moore featured two IRS employees who both tried to            
          be helpful by suggesting that the Appeals officer consider a                
          nominee theory and look at the taxpayer’s “money stream.”  Moore,           
          supra.                                                                      
               The cover letter here is full of similarly “helpful”                   
          suggestions: telling Talbott he shouldn’t consider a CDP hearing            






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007