Industrial Investors - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
                                     Conclusion                                       
               Because there was an impermissible ex parte communication,             
          we remand this case to the IRS Appeals Office closest to Santa              
          Monica, California, for a new CDP hearing with an impartial                 
          Appeals officer.  This hearing should be conducted face-to-face             
          unless Industrial waives its right by agreeing to a hearing by              
          telephone or through the mail.  The cover letter which we                   
          determined was an ex parte communication--and this opinion with             
          its lengthy quotation from it--should be removed from                       
          Industrial’s administrative file and not shown to the Appeals               
          officer conducting the hearing on remand.                                   

                                             An appropriate order will                
                                        be issued.                                    























Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16

Last modified: November 10, 2007