Dennis L. and Margaret J. Knudsen - Page 19




                                       - 19 -                                         
              The following table compares the adjusted gross income (AGI)            
         that petitioners would have reported if they had not engaged in              
         their breeding activity with the AGI that they actually reported             
         on their Federal income tax returns for 1995 through 2002:                   
            Year             AGI without ERE       AGI reported                       
             1995           $553,075            $199,175                             
           1996              716,359             428,485                              
           1997              748,293             409,896                              
           1998              688,703             413,584                              
           1999              781,242             440,399                              
           2000              1,003,786           586,239                              
         2001                1,072,126           613,985                              
           2002                   886,312        555,856                              
              The losses from ERE allowed petitioners to reduce their                 
         Federal income tax liability by $170,732 for 2000 and $184,507               
         for 2001.                                                                    
         Notice of Deficiency                                                         
              Following an examination of petitioners’ Federal income tax             
         returns for 2000 and 2001, respondent issued a notice of                     
         deficiency in which he determined:  (1) Petitioners’ animal                  
         breeding activity in those years was an activity not engaged in              
         for profit under section 183, and expense deductions claimed with            
         respect to the breeding activity were disallowed, except as                  
         allowed by section 183(b), and (2) computational adjustments to              
         petitioners’ itemized deductions were required because of the                
         preceding adjustments.                                                       









Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008