- 2 - receiving a recommendation that P-Wife be granted relief from R’s office that specializes in sec. 6015, I.R.C., cases. Held, further, P-Wife submitted a qualified offer under sec. 7430(c)(4)(E) and (g), I.R.C., during the qualified offer period, and P-Wife’s liability was determined to be less than if R had accepted the qualified offer. Held, further, R’s concession was not a settlement for purposes of sec. 7430(c)(4)(E)(ii), I.R.C. Karen L. Hawkins, for petitioner Rhita S. Lippitz. Paul E. Shick, for the Estate of Charles Lippitz. James M. Klein, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION GOEKE, Judge: This matter is currently before the Court on petitioner Rhita Lippitz’s motion for the recovery of litigation costs. In relevant part petitioner1 alleged, and respondent ultimately conceded, that she is entitled to relief under section 6015(c)2 from any additional joint liability determined for her and her late husband Charles Lippitz for taxable years 1980 through 1985. Petitioner moves for the recovery of litigation 1For convenience, references to petitioner in the singular are to Rhita Lippitz. 2Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, and all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and Procedure.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007