Estate of Charles A. Lippitz, Deceased, Michael Lippitz, Administrator and Rhita S. Lippitz - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          to litigation fees because she is the prevailing party within the           
          meaning of section 7430(c)(4)(E)(i), because the judgment is less           
          than her qualified offer.                                                   
                                     Discussion                                       
          A. Prevailing Party Generally                                               
               Section 7430(a) authorizes the award of reasonable                     
          litigation costs paid or incurred in a court proceeding which is            
          brought by or against the United States in connection with the              
          determination, collection, or refund of any tax, interest, or               
          penalty under the Internal Revenue Code.  The taxpayer must                 
          establish that she:  (1) Is the prevailing party; (2) has                   
          exhausted the available administrative remedies; (3) has not                
          unreasonably protracted the court proceedings; and (4) has                  
          claimed litigation costs that are reasonable.  Sec. 7430(a) and             
          (b)(1), (3).  The taxpayer bears the burden of proving that these           
          requirements are met.  Rule 232(e).  A taxpayer is generally the            
          prevailing party if the taxpayer substantially prevailed with               
          respect to either the amount in controversy or the most                     
          significant issue or set of issues.  Sec. 7430(c)(4)(A).  Under             
          section 7430(c)(4)(B), even if the taxpayer meets the                       
          requirements of a prevailing party under section 7430(c)(4)(A),             
          the taxpayer will not be treated as a prevailing party if the               
          Commissioner’s position in the proceeding was substantially                 
          justified.                                                                  







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007