Linda K. Minton - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          All dollar amounts have been rounded to the nearest dollar.                 
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT1                                   
               Some facts have been stipulated and are so found.  The                 
          stipulation of facts, with attached exhibits, is incorporated by            
          this reference.2                                                            


               1  In part, Rule 151 provides as follows:                              
               RULE 151. BRIEFS                                                       
                                    * * * * * * *                                     
                    (e) Form and Content: * * *                                       
                                    * * * * * * *                                     
                    (3) * * * In an answering or reply brief, the                     
               party shall set forth any objections, together with the                
               reasons therefor, to any proposed findings of any other                
               party, showing the numbers of the statements to which                  
               the objections are directed; in addition, the party may                
               set forth alternative proposed findings of fact.                       
               Petitioner has filed an answering brief, but she has failed            
          therein to set forth objections to the proposed findings of fact            
          made by respondent.  Accordingly, we must conclude that                     
          petitioner has conceded respondent’s proposed findings of fact as           
          correct except to the extent that respondent has failed to direct           
          us to any evidence in the record supporting those proposed                  
          findings or those findings are clearly inconsistent with either             
          evidence in the record or petitioner’s proposed findings of fact.           
          See, e.g., Jonson v. Commissioner, 118 T.C. 106, 108 n.4 (2002),            
          affd. 353 F.3d 1181 (10th Cir. 2003).                                       
               2  At trial, the Court reserved judgment with respect to               
          respondent’s objection to two, and petitioner’s objection to one,           
          of the exhibits (Exs. 17-P, 22-P, and 35-R) attached to the                 
          stipulation of facts.  Before the conclusion of the trial, the              
          Court sustained respondent’s objection (hearsay) to Ex. 17-P.               
          The Court directed the parties to address on brief the                      
          admissibility of the two other exhibits.  Assuming arguendo that            
          we were to resolve the two remaining disputes in petitioner’s               
          favor, we would nonetheless find for respondent in this case.               
          Therefore, our findings of fact (and opinion) take into account             
          petitioner’s Ex. 22-P and exclude from consideration respondent’s           
          Ex. 35-R.                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008