Patrick G. & Valerie V. O'Malley - Page 23





                                                   - 23 -                                                      
                      9/16/04                        5140                      925.31                          
                      10/12/04                       1540                      1,855.62                        
                      12/17/04                       5145                      1,845.62                        
                      2/1/05                         6015                      920.31                          
                      3/11/05                        1000                      925.31                          
                      3/26/05                        6028                      920.31                          
                      5/13/05                        6034                      925.31                          
                      6/4/05                         6045                      920.31                          
                      7/18/05                        1001                      1,845.62                        
                      9/13/05                          -                       925.31                          
                      10/8/05                        6119                     920.31                           
                      11/4/05                        6133                      920.31                          
                      12/2/05                        6145                      920.31                          
                   1In the case of payments evidenced by petitioners’ checks, the dates                        
             indicated are the dates of the respective checks.  In the case of payments                        
             evidenced by petitioners’ bank statements, the dates indicated are the dates                      
             reflected on such respective statements.                                                          
                   2Except for the reduced payments attributable to the refinanced F&M Bank                    
             2000 loan, the record is not altogether clear why the amounts of the payments                     
             that petitioners made to F&M Bank varied at times.  However, it appears that                      
             certain payments that petitioners made to F&M Bank were increased to reflect                      
             additional interest and/or late charges with respect to the $180,000 F&M Bank                     
             2000 loan or the refinanced F&M Bank 2000 loan that F&M Bank imposed because                      
             of late payments by petitioners.  It also appears that petitioners intended                       
             that certain payments that they made on the refinanced F&M Bank 2000 loan,                        
             which were in amounts that are approximately twice as much as the amounts of                      
             the other payments that they generally made, were to be applied as payments on                    
             that loan for the month of the date of the check and the following month.                         
             3Check Nos. 1097, 3866, and 3887 were issued by a process known as “Pay                           
             by check over the phone Western Union phone pay”.  Edward O’Malley’s name                         
             appeared both in the upper left hand corner and the signature line of each of                     
             those checks.  However, the payment on each of those checks was drawn from one                    
             of petitioners’ Bank of America checking accounts.                                                
                   Pursuant to the agreement between Edward O’Malley and Mr.                                   
             O’Malley, as modified by them when Edward O’Malley agreed to                                      
             refinance the $180,000 F&M Bank 2000 loan:  (1) From June 14,                                     
             2000, until at least the time of the trial in this case in early                                  
             2006, Edward O’Malley did not (a) make any payments to F&M Bank                                   
             on the $180,000 F&M Bank 2000 loan or the refinanced F&M Bank                                     
             2000 loan, (b) make any payments on the second loan with respect                                  









Page:  Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007