Robert Strong & Apgar Architects, PC - Page 11




                                        - 10 -                                        
               Finally, we note that because New York corporation law                 
          provides that petitioner, a professional service corporation                
          engaged in architectural services, may issue shares only to                 
          individuals who are licensed architects in New York State, we               
          suspect that the treasury shares at the heart of this case were             
          reacquired by petitioner from Mr. Apgar and Mr. Oliver for the              
          purpose of circumventing the ownership test of section                      
          448(d)(2)(B) and hence, avoiding application of the 35-percent              
          flat tax.  N.Y. Bus. Corp. Law sec. 1507 (McKinney 2003).                   
          Accordingly, we sustain respondent’s determination.                         
                                                                                     
                                                   Decision will be entered           
                                              for respondent.                         

























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11

Last modified: November 10, 2007