Martin and Sharon Smith - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               The parties filed with the Court stipulations of fact and              
          accompanying exhibits.  The stipulated facts are found                      
          accordingly.  Petitioners are husband and wife, and they resided            
          in Tucson, Arizona, when their petition was filed.                          
               On their Federal income tax returns beginning in 1984,                 
          petitioners claimed losses and credits from their investment in             
          several partnerships organized and operated by Walter J. Hoyt III           
          (Hoyt).  The partnerships were subject to the unified audit and             
          litigation procedures of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility           
          Act of 1982, Pub. L. 97-248, sec. 402(a), 96 Stat. 648.  Hoyt was           
          convicted on criminal charges relating to the promotion of these            
          partnerships.                                                               
               Petitioners’ claim to the partnerships’ losses and credits             
          resulted in the underreporting of their personal 1984, 1985,                
          1986, and 1991 Federal income taxes.  On November 13, 2003,                 
          respondent mailed to petitioners a Letter 1058, Final Notice of             
          Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to a Hearing.  The notice           
          informed petitioners that respondent proposed to levy on their              
          property to collect amounts owed as to their 1984, 1985, 1986,              
          and 1991 Federal income taxes; all of these amounts were                    
          attributable to the just referenced underreporting of income.               
          The notice advised petitioners that they were entitled to a                 








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007