- 9 - and-gravel property in turn forces us to estimate a number of factors: • total volume of minerals on the property, • setbacks, • size of work area, • slope of pit walls, • natural waste, • rate of extraction, • royalty rate, • discount rate, and • residual value. A. Parties’ Positions The Commissioner’s proposed value of $301,000 is based on the work of its expert, Edwin Moritz. Moritz is a member of the American Institute of Minerals Appraisers and the Society of Petroleum Engineers, and has appeared as an expert witness on the FMV of sand-and-gravel properties in other courts. He relies on the Uniform Standards for Professional Appraisers Practice (USPAP), the Uniform Appraisal Standards for Federal Land Acquisitions (UASFLA), and caselaw for the proposition that the comparable-sales approach is best. See Cloverport Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States, 6 Cl. Ct. 178, 189 (1984). After searching the deed records in the county where the Hamblen Road property is located, Moritz identified five sales that he said were possibly comparable. Moritz interviewed the buyers and sellers in each of these transactions and concluded that three of them were in fact comparable. He adjusted the prices involved to account for various differences with the Hamblen Road property and then usedPage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007