Cheryl A. Wolf - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
          all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and              
          Procedure.                                                                  

                                     Background                                       
               In 1996 and other years, petitioner’s construction company             
          performed work for the United States Merchant Marine Academy                
          (USMMA).  During 1996, petitioner became concerned about                    
          perceived violations of Federal law on the part of personnel or             
          contractors working for or associated with the USMMA.                       
               In mid-1996, petitioner contacted respondent about                     
          petitioner’s concerns relating to the above alleged violations of           
          Federal law.                                                                
               On June 2, 1997, petitioner timely filed her 1996 individual           
          Federal income tax return without including payment of the $741             
          Federal income tax reported due thereon.  Respondent assessed the           
          tax, and respondent sent notice and demand for payment thereof to           
          petitioner, but the tax remained unpaid through early 2003.                 
               In the summer of 2003, respondent initiated against                    
          petitioner collection activity, levied upon $50 of petitioner’s             
          State income tax refund, and applied the $50 against petitioner’s           
          outstanding 1996 Federal income tax.                                        
               In response to respondent’s efforts to collect petitioner’s            
          $741 Federal income tax, petitioner mailed to respondent a letter           
          in which petitioner represented that she would pay the balance              
          due, but in which petitioner also referred to violations of                 






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007