- 3 -
Federal law petitioner alleges she had observed at the USMMA and,
without specifically requesting a reward, in which petitioner
made vague claims of entitlement to unspecified tax credits.
On or about August 1, 2003, petitioner mailed to respondent
a letter requesting a section 6330 Appeals Office hearing. In
the letter, petitioner again objected to respondent’s collection
activity and made vague references to the violations of Federal
law petitioner alleges she had observed at the USMMA and to tax
credits.
On January 6, 2004, petitioner’s representative and
respondent’s settlement officer engaged in the face-to-face
section 6330 Appeals Office hearing that petitioner had requested
relating to respondent’s above collection activity. At the
hearing, petitioner objected to any collection activity and
repeated her vague references to violations of Federal law at the
USMMA and to tax credits.
On February 4, 2004, respondent mailed to petitioner a
notice of determination sustaining respondent’s levy on
petitioner’s $50 State income tax refund and other collection
activity relating to petitioner’s 1996 Federal income tax.
On March 2, 2004, petitioner filed the petition herein,
again objecting to respondent’s levy and collection activity,
requesting that the Court order respondent to investigate alleged
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: November 10, 2007