Cheryl A. Wolf - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Federal law petitioner alleges she had observed at the USMMA and,           
          without specifically requesting a reward, in which petitioner               
          made vague claims of entitlement to unspecified tax credits.                
               On or about August 1, 2003, petitioner mailed to respondent            
          a letter requesting a section 6330 Appeals Office hearing.  In              
          the letter, petitioner again objected to respondent’s collection            
          activity and made vague references to the violations of Federal             
          law petitioner alleges she had observed at the USMMA and to tax             
          credits.                                                                    
               On January 6, 2004, petitioner’s representative and                    
          respondent’s settlement officer engaged in the face-to-face                 
          section 6330 Appeals Office hearing that petitioner had requested           
          relating to respondent’s above collection activity.  At the                 
          hearing, petitioner objected to any collection activity and                 
          repeated her vague references to violations of Federal law at the           
          USMMA and to tax credits.                                                   
               On February 4, 2004, respondent mailed to petitioner a                 
          notice of determination sustaining respondent’s levy on                     
          petitioner’s $50 State income tax refund and other collection               
          activity relating to petitioner’s 1996 Federal income tax.                  
               On March 2, 2004, petitioner filed the petition herein,                
          again objecting to respondent’s levy and collection activity,               
          requesting that the Court order respondent to investigate alleged           









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007