Cheryl A. Wolf - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
          sole authorization for our jurisdiction to review respondent’s              
          denial of informant rewards.                                                
               Because petitioner’s information about the USMMA was                   
          provided to respondent well before December 20, 2006, the                   
          provisions of section 7623 as enacted in TRHCA are not                      
          applicable.  We shall grant respondent’s motion to dismiss from             
          this case for lack of jurisdiction petitioner’s claim for a                 
          reward relating to information she provided to respondent                   
          relating to alleged corruption at the USMMA.                                
               Because petitioner raises no viable, appropriate issue                 
          relating to respondent’s section 6330 levy and other collection             
          activity, we shall grant respondent’s motion for summary judgment           
          as to all other matters in this case.                                       

                                                An appropriate order and              
                                           decision will be entered.                  





















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5

Last modified: November 10, 2007