- 5 -
sole authorization for our jurisdiction to review respondent’s
denial of informant rewards.
Because petitioner’s information about the USMMA was
provided to respondent well before December 20, 2006, the
provisions of section 7623 as enacted in TRHCA are not
applicable. We shall grant respondent’s motion to dismiss from
this case for lack of jurisdiction petitioner’s claim for a
reward relating to information she provided to respondent
relating to alleged corruption at the USMMA.
Because petitioner raises no viable, appropriate issue
relating to respondent’s section 6330 levy and other collection
activity, we shall grant respondent’s motion for summary judgment
as to all other matters in this case.
An appropriate order and
decision will be entered.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: November 10, 2007