James G. and Elaine A. Wanchek - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          other parties2 involved in the construction and design of                   
          petitioners’ house.  In their complaint, petitioners alleged                
          negligence, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, unfair trade                
          practices, breach of warranty, breach of duty of good faith and             
          fair dealing, breach of contract, prima facie tort, and emotional           
          distress.3                                                                  
               In October 2001, before trial, petitioners and the parties             
          whom they had sued agreed to settle the lawsuit for $130,000,               
          $40,500 of which was to be paid by Mr. Green.  The settlement               
          agreement provided, among other things, that no party was to                
          admit “any responsibility or wrongdoing whatsoever.”  On February           
          4, 2002, the State court granted a joint motion to dismiss the              
          lawsuit filed by petitioners and dismissed that lawsuit with                
          prejudice.  No criminal charges were ever filed against Mr.                 
          Green, or any of the other parties involved in the design and               
          construction of petitioners’ house, for any matter relating to              
          the design and construction of petitioners’ house.                          
               In January 2003, petitioners filed a Form 1040X, Amended               
          U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for the 2001 taxable year in             
          which they claimed a net theft loss deduction of $172,904 for               


               2 Those parties included Mr. Cabber and, ultimately, eight             
          subcontractors.                                                             
               3  Petitioners also filed three amended complaints.  Those             
          amended complaints, other than adding as defendants two of the              
          eight subcontractors, do not differ materially from the original            
          complaint so as to warrant discussion.                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008