- 12 -
altered by the fact that, years after constructing petitioners’
house, Mr. Green left the homebuilding business and moved out of
New Mexico. Petitioners were the victims of poor workmanship,
which, without more, is not a crime.
The Court has considered all of petitioner’s contentions,
arguments, requests, and statements. To the extent not discussed
herein, we conclude that they are meritless, moot, or
irrelevant.11
To reflect the foregoing,
An appropriate order and
decision will be entered.
11 Because petitioners have not sustained a theft loss, we
need not discuss issues relating to the amount of the claimed
loss. Also, respondent filed a motion in limine to prevent the
testimony of two experts. Because we hold for respondent without
considering that evidence, the question of whether that evidence
should be admitted is also moot, and respondent’s motion will
therefore be denied.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Last modified: March 27, 2008