Bea-Jaye Ware - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          filing separately, petitioner would have been entitled to a                 
          refund.                                                                     
               Petitioner and Mr. Crouch filed their 1994 through 1996 tax            
          returns as married filing separately.  Petitioner and Mr. Crouch            
          filed a joint 1997 Federal income tax return on May 7, 1999,                
          reflecting an amount owed of $33,423.  The amount owed was                  
          attributable solely to Mr. Crouch’s business activities.                    
          Petitioner and Mr. Crouch included a $6,500 payment with their              
          1997 return and made an additional payment of $4,000 in August              
          1999.  In October 2000, petitioner received notice that her wages           
          were to be garnished in order to pay her and Mr. Crouch’s 1997              
          outstanding tax liability.  For pay periods ending November 3 and           
          17, and December 1 and 15, 2000, Advanstar withheld $557 from               
          petitioner’s pay as garnishment.3                                           
               On November 9, 2000, petitioner and Mr. Crouch filed joint             
          Federal income tax returns for 1998 and 1999, reflecting amounts            
          owed of $19,671 and $27,321, respectively.  The amounts owed were           
          attributable solely to Mr. Crouch’s business activities.  No                
          payments accompanied the 1998 and 1999 returns.  Petitioner                 
          voluntarily signed the returns on November 9, 2000.  At the time            
          she signed the returns, she knew there was an outstanding tax               

               3  On Feb. 7, 2002, petitioner and Mr. Crouch’s 1997 joint             
          tax liability was discharged under 11 U.S.C. sec. 727, by the               
          U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio.                    
          Respondent has conceded that he will no longer attempt to collect           
          the discharged liability.                                                   






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007