Bea-Jaye Ware - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
               On September 19, 2001, petitioner submitted to respondent a            
          Form 886-A, Innocent Spouse Questionnaire.  Petitioner reported             
          monthly gross income of $3,715 and monthly expenses of $5,685.              
          Petitioner’s monthly expenses included, among other things, $300            
          for clothing, $700 for vehicle expenses, $240 for “pet care”, and           
          $400 in miscellaneous expenses.                                             
               On December 20, 2001, respondent issued petitioner an                  
          initial determination letter.  Respondent determined that                   
          petitioner was not entitled to equitable relief under section               
          6015(f) for the years at issue, stating:                                    
               To qualify for relief under IRC Section 6015(f), you                   
               must establish that you believed the tax would be paid                 
               at the time of filing the return.  Information in your                 
               case file does not establish that you had belief that                  
               the tax would be paid at the time of filing.                           
               Therefore, your request for relief for the tax years *                 
               * * [at issue] has been disallowed.                                    
          On March 4, 2002, respondent received from petitioner a Form                
          12509, Statement of Disagreement, in which petitioner repeated              
          her arguments set forth in her request for innocent spouse                  
          relief.                                                                     
               On July 22, 2002, respondent advised petitioner that her               
          case had been received for consideration and identified Appeals             
          Officer Denise Neidermeyer (Ms. Neidermeyer) as the person                  
          handling her case.  Ms. Neidermeyer determined that “The taxpayer           
          knew or had reason to know that the tax would not be paid when              
          she signed the [1998 and 1999] returns.  This is evidenced by the           







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007