- 11 - 2. Spousal Abuse Petitioner did not allege that she suffered from spousal abuse. This factor is neutral. 3. Significant Benefit Respondent determined that petitioner received significant benefit beyond normal support from the unpaid tax liability. During the years at issue, petitioner and Mr. Crouch failed to pay self-assessed taxes of nearly $70,000, excluding any penalties or interest. While the outstanding tax liability arose solely from Mr. Crouch’s business activities, petitioner does not allege that Mr. Crouch secreted his earnings that would otherwise have been used to pay the taxes due. The record establishes that petitioner’s and Mr. Crouch’s failure to pay the taxes due increased their expendable income. Further, petitioner testified that her husband’s income allowed her to meet the monthly expenses in excess of her own income. Petitioner’s monthly expenses included $300 for clothing, $700 for vehicle expenses, $240 for pet care, and $400 in miscellaneous expenses. While neither petitioner nor respondent has elaborated on what “normal support” is in this case, the above-described expenses certainly go beyond normal support. Because the underpayment of tax allowed petitioner to meet these expenses, we find that petitioner received significant benefit beyond normal support from the unpaid liability. This factor weighs against relief.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 10, 2007