Janet Marie Wilson, Petitioner, and Kenneth E. Wilson, Intervenor - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
               In response to the notice of deficiency, petitioner filed a            
          petition with this Court on April 22, 2005.  Also on April 22,              
          2005, petitioner submitted to respondent a Form 8857, Request for           
          Innocent Spouse Relief (And Separation of Liability and Equitable           
          Relief), and a Form 12510, Questionnaire for Requesting Spouse.             
               On July 12, 2005, intervenor filed a notice of intervention            
          and objected to petitioner’s being relieved of liability under              
          section 6015.2                                                              
                                       OPINION                                        
               Petitioner does not dispute the deficiencies and penalties             
          determined by respondent for the years in issue.  Instead, she              
          seeks relief from joint and several liability under section                 
          6015(c).  Respondent agrees that petitioner is entitled to relief           
          from the entire joint tax liability under section 6015(c).3                 
          However, as previously mentioned, intervenor objects to                     
          petitioner’s being relieved of liability under section 6015.                




               2  On March 17, 2005, intervenor filed a separate petition             
          in response to the notice of deficiency.  See Wilson v.                     
          Commissioner, docket No. 5184-05S.  In his petition, intervenor             
          sought a redetermination of the deficiencies determined by                  
          respondent and requested relief from liability under sec. 6015.             
               3  Petitioner also argues, and respondent agrees, that if              
          she is not entitled to relief under sec. 6015(c), then she is               
          entitled to relief under sec. 66(c).  Because we find petitioner            
          is entitled to relief under sec. 6015(c), we do not address                 
          petitioner’s alternative claim under sec. 66(c).                            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007