Janet Marie Wilson, Petitioner, and Kenneth E. Wilson, Intervenor - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          and petitioner submitted the Form 8857 shortly after her receipt            
          of the notice of deficiency.  Therefore, petitioner is eligible             
          to request relief under section 6015(c).                                    
               In general, section 6015(c) allows proportionate relief from           
          joint and several liability by relieving the requesting spouse              
          from liability for items giving rise to a deficiency that would             
          have been allocable to the nonrequesting spouse had they filed              
          separate returns.  See sec. 6015(c)(1); see also sec.                       
          6015(d)(3)(A).  Thus, we must determine whether the items giving            
          rise to the deficiencies in this case are allocable to petitioner           
          or intervenor.                                                              
               The items giving rise to the deficiencies, including the               
          unreported gross receipts, related to the operation of the                  
          businesses.  Section 1.6015-3(d)(2)(iii), Income Tax Regs.,                 
          provides that omitted items of business income are allocated to             
          the spouse who owned the business.  Petitioner and respondent               
          agree that all items giving rise to the deficiencies are                    
          allocable to intervenor because intervenor was the true owner of            
          the businesses.  Intervenor argues that the unreported gross                
          receipts are allocable to petitioner.5                                      

               5  Other items giving rise to the deficiencies include the             
          disallowed Schedule C expenses and the self-employment taxes.               
          Intervenor does not address these items on brief.  We assume                
          that, since intervenor listed himself as the sole proprietor on             
          the Schedules C on which the expense deductions were claimed and            
          because he identified himself as “self-employed” while he                   
                                                             (continued...)           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007