Janet Marie Wilson, Petitioner, and Kenneth E. Wilson, Intervenor - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
               Section 6015(e)(4) grants the nonelecting spouse                       
          (intervenor) some participatory entitlement in an action to                 
          determine the electing spouse’s (petitioner’s) right to relief              
          from joint and several liability pursuant to section 6015.  Rule            
          325; Corson v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 354, 364-365 (2000).  By              
          exercising that right, intervenor became a party to this case.4             
          Tipton v. Commissioner, 127 T.C. 214, 217 (2006).  Therefore, in            
          light of intervenor’s opposition to petitioner’s being granted              
          relief, we shall proceed to examine the requirements of section             
          6015(c) to decide whether petitioner is entitled to relief under            
          this subsection.                                                            
               As a prerequisite to relief under section 6015(c), the                 
          requesting spouse must be legally separated or no longer married            
          to the nonrequesting spouse at the time the request for relief is           
          made.  Sec. 6015(c)(3)(A)(i)(I).  The request for relief under              
          section 6015(c) may be made at any time after a deficiency for              
          such year is asserted, but no later than 2 years after the date             
          on which the Commissioner has begun collection activities with              
          respect to the requesting spouse.  Sec. 6015(c)(3)(B).                      
          Petitioner and intervenor were divorced on September 23, 2004,              


               4  However, as the intervening party, intervenor may not               
          enlarge the issues or alter the nature of this proceeding.  See             
          Tipton v. Commissioner, 127 T.C. 213, 217 (2006).  This                     
          proceeding concerns only whether petitioner is entitled to relief           
          from joint and several liability.  We do not consider arguments             
          raised by intervenor regarding the underlying liability or his              
          entitlement to innocent spouse relief.                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007