William C. and Dorothy M. Smith - Page 12




                                       - 12 -                                         
          personal pleasure or recreation are involved.  See sec.                     
          1.183-2(b)(1) through (9), Income Tax Regs.                                 
               No single factor, nor even the existence of a majority of              
          factors favoring or disfavoring the existence of a profit                   
          objective, is controlling.  Brannen v. Commissioner, 722 F.2d               
          695, 704 (11th Cir. 1984), affg. 78 T.C. 471 (1982); sec.                   
          1.183-2(b), Income Tax Regs.  Rather, the relevant facts and                
          circumstances of the case are determinative.  See Golanty v.                
          Commissioner, 72 T.C. 411, 426 (1979), affd. without published              
          opinion 647 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1981).  On the basis of the facts            
          and circumstances, we hold that Mrs. Smith was not engaged in her           
          direct marketing activities for profit within the meaning of                
          section 183.4                                                               
               1.  Manner in Which the Taxpayer Carried On the Activity               
               Maintaining complete and accurate books and records,                   
          conducting an activity in a manner substantially similar to that            
          of comparable businesses which are profitable, and making changes           
          in operations to adopt new techniques or abandon unprofitable               
          methods suggest that a taxpayer conducted an activity for profit.           
          Engdahl v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 659, 666-667 (1979); sec. 1.183-           
          2(b)(1), Income Tax Regs.                                                   

               4We note that petitioners did not argue to shift the burden            
          of proof under sec. 7491(a).  Regardless, the outcome of this               
          case is determined on the preponderance of the evidence after               
          trial and is unaffected by sec. 7491(a).  See Estate of Bongard             
          v. Commissioner, 124 T.C. 95, 111 (2005).                                   






Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 10, 2007