- 22 - When beneficial ownership of stock is transferred, with or without legal title, the transfer generally occurs pursuant to an agreement between the transferor and the transferee. Reitz v. Commissioner, 61 T.C. 443, 447 (1974), affd. 507 F.2d 1279 (5th Cir. 1975). Petitioners argue that “Mr. Dunne was stripped of his beneficial ownership rights” in FRC after the Inverness agreement, but they have not cited any cases, nor are we aware of any, where one shareholder was able to take beneficial ownership of stock away from another shareholder absent an agreement between the two shareholders or a provision in the corporation’s governing articles to that effect. On the contrary, we have held that when one shareholder merely interferes with another shareholder’s participation in the corporation as a result of a poor relationship between the shareholders, such interference does not amount to a deprivation of the economic benefit of the shares. Hightower v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2005-274, affd. without published opinion 2008-1 USTC par. 50,185 (9th Cir. 2008). We do not believe that the Inverness agreement gave Mr. Marcus any rights to Mr. Dunne’s stock either by December 31, 1996, or on some other date. Clearly, Mr. Dunne and Mr. Marcus intended a sale to occur at some point, but they did not set any concrete terms or make any binding agreement. It is apparent from the testimony that the Inverness agreement was merely anPage: Previous 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 NextLast modified: March 27, 2008